The Peach Music Festival Announces Weekend Change For 2018

Tag: 北京鸡最多的公寓

first_imgSince its inception in 2018, The Peach Music Festival has quickly become one of the most beloved music festivals of the summer. The festival has become known as an Allman Brothers Band extended family gathering, which each rendition boasting an enviable lineup frequently tapping members of the band and their various side projects. After a successful 2017, today, The Peach Music Festival announced a major change as it looks toward 2018.The Peach Festival: Continuing The Allman Brothers Band Legacy After 2017’s Major LossesWhile in the past, the festival has taken place during mid-August (this year’s festival went down across August 10th through 13th), in 2018, The Peach Music Festival will return to Montage Mountain in Scranton, Pennsylvania, instead taking place in mid-July from July 19th through 22nd. As noted with the announcement, Early Bird Passes go on sale on Thursday at 10 am for only $99 plus fees. For more information on the festival, head to the event’s website here.[Photo: Phierce Photo]last_img read more


Tag: 北京鸡最多的公寓

first_imgBy Elizabeth AndressUniversity of Georgia There are many reasons for preserving food at home. Some have to do with satisfaction, creativity or family tradition. Another may be economical. The practice may save money for some, but doesn’t for everyone. If you are going to try and save money by freezing or canning produce at home, find low-cost sources for the raw food. To determine if you can save money this way, compare the cost of similar foods purchased at the grocery store. Food and equipment costsFood costs — whether home grown or purchased — can be a variable expense, depending on your situation. The cost of additional ingredients can also vary widely. You may just need sugar or fruit juice for packing fruits in containers, or your recipe may include herbs, spices, vinegar, salt, pepper, garlic or other ingredients. The cost of equipment, such as a freezer or canner, can be significant if you are just starting out. Supplies such as packaging, funnels, jars and lids factor into the equation, too, as well as the energy of running stoves and freezers. If you assign a monetary value for your time, the expense of producing preserved items at home can suddenly become significant.CanningThe two most common forms of food preservation are canning and freezing. Many foods can also be dehydrated for longer-term storage. Canning can be less expensive than freezing, but more time and energy are spent to prepare and process the foods. There are risks associated with canning foods. Specific preserving methods must be used to keep the food safe when stored at room temperatures. Food can spoil and make you sick if canning directions are not followed exactly. One cost to consider when canning is jars, which cost $8 to $14 a dozen. Jars can be used for many years if handled carefully. If taken care of properly, ring bands should last for years also. The flat lids, however, need to be purchased every year. FreezingFreezing is a faster way to prepare food for long-term storage than canning or drying. Frozen produce, if carefully preserved, tastes fresher than food preserved using other methods. It costs between 38 cents and 50 cents a year to maintain a freezer for one pound of food. In general, chest freezers are less expensive to run, but upright freezers can be more convenient. Better insulated freezers can cost more, but cost less to operate. A well-managed freezer can save time, energy and gas from fewer trips to the store. To get the most out of your freezer, freeze only foods that the family likes to eat, and in amounts that can be served at one time. When freezing foods, be sure to use proper packaging to protect flavor, color, moisture content and nutritional value from the dry conditions of the freezer. Freezer containers should be moisture-vapor resistant, durable, leak proof, flexible, crack resistant and easy to seal and mark. Rigid plastic containers can be used for liquids. Freezer bags and wraps are more suitable for dry-pack products that contain little or no liquid. Vacuum packaging is a great choice for maintaining food quality and is fairly easy to do. Just be sure to read the instructions on how to package wet and dry foods. Vacuum packaging removes the air that can lead to drying, oxidation and off-flavors, even at freezer temperatures. Vacuum packaging does add additional expenses to home food preservation. The packaging is more expensive than other flexible bags and wraps, and of course, there is the initial cost for the appliance. There are different preservation methods for many foods. Choose one that works for your family and produces the form of food you like. Saving money may not be the major goal in preserving food at home. You might find the effort and expense worth the value of creating your own food supply, supporting local farmers in your community or passing along family traditions. (Elizabeth Andress is a food safety specialist with University of Georgia Cooperative Extension.)last_img read more


Tag: 北京鸡最多的公寓

first_imgCHENNAI, India (Reuters) – Hardik Pandya’s all-round brilliance and some excellent bowling by the Indian spinners secured a 26-run victory against Australia under the Duckworth-Lewis method in the rain-hit first one-day international on Sunday.Pandya struck a career-best 83 and Mahendra Singh Dhoni made 79 to help the hosts overcome a top-order collapse and post 281-7 at the MA Chidambaram Stadium.However, a lengthy mid-innings rain break left Australia needing 164 runs in 21 overs to go 1-0 up in the five-match series.Glenn Maxwell smashed 39 and James Faulkner made 32 not out but Pandya (2-28) and India’s spin duo of Yuzvendra Chahal (3-30) and Kuldeep Yadav (2-33) combined to restrict Australia to 137-9.Earlier, home captain Virat Kohli’s decision to bat appeared to backfire when Nathan Coulter-Nile’s three-wicket burst reduced India to 11-3 inside six overs.Kedar Jadhav and Rohit Sharma then added 53 runs for the fourth wicket to arrest the slide.Jadhav lived dangerously to score his 40, while Sharma made 28 before both fell to Marcus Stoinis, leaving India reeling at 87-7 in the 22nd over.A 200-plus score looked a distant dream for the hosts at that stage but Pandya and Dhoni had other ideas.Pandya clobbered Adam Zampa for three successive sixes in a 24-run over, bringing up his fifty off 48 balls in the process.The all-rounder blasted five sixes and as many fours in his 66-ball blitz before falling to the leg-spinner.Dhoni, who took 67 balls to score his first boundary, accelerated towards the end and raised 72 runs with Bhuvneshwar Kumar who scored 32 not out.Australia wobbled early in their chase as Jasprit Bumrah bowled Hilton Cartwright and then took a swirling skyer to dismiss rival skipper Steve Smith.Yadav dismissed David Warner for 25 but Maxwell looked in murderous mood as he clobbered the left-arm wristspinner for three successive sixes.Chahal ended Maxwell’s 18-ball blitz and went on to claim two more wickets as India triumphed despite dropping three catches which could have cost them dearly in such a small chase.Eden Gardens in Kolkata will host the second one-dayer on Thursday.INDIA InningsA. Rahane c Wade b Coulter-Nile 5Ro. Sharma c Coulter-Nile b Stoinis 28V. Kohli c Maxwell b Coulter-Nile 0M. Pandey c Wade b Coulter-Nile 0K. Jadhav c Cartwright b Stoinis 40M. Dhoni c Warner b Faulkner 79H. Pandya c Faulkner b Zampa 83B. Kumar not out 32K. Yadav not out 0Extras (b-4 lb-2 nb-3 w-5) 14Total (for 7 wickets, 50 overs) 281Fall of wickets: 1-11 A. Rahane,2-11 V. Kohli,3-11 M. Pandey,4-64 Ro. Sharma,5-87 K. Jadhav,6-205 H. Pandya,7-277 M. DhoniDid not bat: Y. Chahal, J. BumrahBowling: P. Cummins 10 – 1 – 44 – 0(w-2),N. Coulter-Nile 10 – 0 – 44 – 3(nb-1 w-1),J. Faulkner 10 – 1 – 67 – 1(nb-2),M. Stoinis 10 – 0 – 54 – 2(w-2)A. Zampa 10 – 0 – 66 – 1.AUSTRALIAInningsD. Warner c Dhoni b K. Yadav 25H. Cartwright b Bumrah 1S. Smith c Bumrah b H. Pandya 1T. Head c Dhoni b H. Pandya 5G. Maxwell c M. Pandey b Chahal 39M. Stoinis c sub b K. Yadav 3M. Wade st Dhoni b Chahal 9J. Faulkner not out 32P. Cummins c Bumrah b Chahal 9N. Coulter-Nile c Jadhav b B. Kumar 2A. Zampa not out 5Extras (lb-1 w-5) 6Total (for 9 wickets, 21 overs) 137Fall of wickets: 1-15 H. Cartwright,2-20 S. Smith,3-29 T. Head,4-35 D. Warner,5-76 G. Maxwell,6-76 M. Stoinis,7-93 M. Wade,8-109 P. Cummins,9-127 N. Coulter-NileBowling: B. Kuma 4 – 0 – 25 – 1(w-2),J. Bumrah 4 – 0 – 20 – 1(w-1),H. Pandya 4 – 0 – 28 – 2(w-1), K. Yadav 4 – 0 – 33 – 2,Y. Chahal 5 – 0 – 30 – 3(w-1)last_img read more


Tag: 北京鸡最多的公寓

first_img Close Forgot password? Please put in your email: Send me my password! Close message Login This blog post All blog posts Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through… RSS Feed Subscribe via email Subscribe Subscribe to this blog’s comments through… RSS Feed Subscribe via email Subscribe Follow the discussion Comments (6) Logging you in… Close Login to IntenseDebate Or create an account Username or Email: Password: Forgot login? Cancel Login Close WordPress.com Username or Email: Password: Lost your password? Cancel Login Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout Logged in as Admin Options Disable comments for this page Save Settings Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity Loading comments… You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input. +2 Vote up Vote down JIM · 257 weeks ago Blown completely out of proportion. No pun intended. Report Reply 0 replies · active 257 weeks ago 0 Vote up Vote down band played on · 257 weeks ago Your answers are three to one…with only one bad. Maybe you should have added one about just poor planning or routine..we all know how much you love K state … Report Reply 1 reply · active 257 weeks ago +1 Vote up Vote down CueballSumnernewscow 94p · 257 weeks ago Are you that mathematically challenged? If my answers are three to one good to bad, it seems I would want the bad to win because the “good” would be split three ways. Report Reply +3 Vote up Vote down Oooops · 257 weeks ago My brother was in the band and they knew exactly what they were doing. Report Reply 0 replies · active 257 weeks ago 0 Vote up Vote down band played on · 257 weeks ago You forgot tasteless…never taunt the rival tell rival week. Report Reply 0 replies · active 257 weeks ago +7 Vote up Vote down anonymous · 257 weeks ago The real issue here is that little stunt, harmless as it may be, is poor sportsmanship – put out there where thousands of kids can see it. Sophomoric pranks like that ought not be done in such a “general public” manner. And k-state trying to hide behind “but it was a spaceship” just makes them look worse. Why lie, we all saw it. Report Reply 0 replies · active 257 weeks ago Post a new comment Enter text right here! Comment as a Guest, or login: Login to IntenseDebate Login to WordPress.com Login to Twitter Go back Tweet this comment Connected as (Logout) Email (optional) Not displayed publicly. Name Email Website (optional) Displayed next to your comments. Not displayed publicly. If you have a website, link to it here. Posting anonymously. Tweet this comment Submit Comment Subscribe to None Replies All new comments Comments by IntenseDebate Enter text right here! Reply as a Guest, or login: Login to IntenseDebate Login to WordPress.com Login to Twitter Go back Tweet this comment Connected as (Logout) Email (optional) Not displayed publicly. Name Email Website (optional) Displayed next to your comments. Not displayed publicly. If you have a website, link to it here. Posting anonymously. Tweet this comment Cancel Submit Comment Subscribe to None Replies All new comments  Loading …Follow us on Twitter. What is your opinion of the K-State marching band halftime controversy? It was disgusting and a deliberate attempt by KSU to embarrass KU. Much ado about nothing. Who cares if it was deliberate? It was funny. I don’t understand the controversy. View Resultslast_img read more